a reflective essay
by Richard Weems
Violence
January 9, 2011.
Violence, by Richard Weems, is a pretty intense piece of writing. This is evidenced by the very first line, which reads "An evening bred from violence, seeded in violence. Steeped in violence." There are so many things right with that phrase (purely the syntax I mean.) The 'power of threes' is used effectively, which reinforces the extent to which that night was concerning violence. It also provides a certain poetic aspect to the words, which is an interesting contrast to the subject of violence. It's also quite effective how the phrases are all sentence fragments. The choppiness of the words provide for a certain suspense, one that effectively mirrors the feeling one may feel when faced with an evening of aggressive acts. All in all, this first line was a very effective way to establish the mood for the entire piece.
Weems also uses effective diction to establish moods within his piece. There is a certain section where, apparently, he and his friends are acting pretty loud and boisterous in public, but "who gives a high holy one if anyone else is a little bothered?" Their obnoxiousness is establish by some diction that seems to compare the speaker and his friends to animals- when they enter the bar, they enter with "deep growls and evil laughs," making the reader think of wild beasts or hyenas. They order "dead animals steeped in fattening sauces and moan [their] approval." He could have just ordered a steak like a normal person, but he had to order "dead animal", and the imagery of "steeped in fattening sauces" is something that could be considered rather off-putting...to a human at least.
This tone, though fascinating, really could not be used for an AP essay. It very "fight club"-esque; the reader is in the speakers mind, his fragmented thoughts, his animal tendencies. Not to mention that I don't much think the AP grader would greatly appreciate being accosted with the f bomb after a long day of grading.
Pass! :)
ReplyDeleteGood job hitting all the requirements for outside reading as well as covering the specific prompts for the reflective essay. Your analysis of rhetorical devices was very strong; good use of vocab, like syntax and the "power of three" and such. =D
One tiny suggestion: You talked about the strengths of this essay, but you didn't really mention any weaknesses. Maybe address this in a sentence or two next time?
Pass.
ReplyDeleteYou met all of the criteria and had an especially good analysis of syntax. Your conclusion was entertaining (I liked your Fight Club reference).
Pass! You met all of the requirements and has great analysis. I also liked how you embedded many examples into the piece. Great job!
ReplyDelete